Speaking of you...totally random. I had a dream about you last night. You called me for odd reason (don't know how you got the number but darn, you're resourceful) and you were talking to me. I decided that I'd keep up the conversation and asked you something about Sam/Jack.
Well, that made your day and you went off and somehow I ended up at your house. And you showed me this collectible that you'd found bought. It was this ornate shattered champagne glass from Sam and Jack's wedding.
And I met your husband and son. I promise I am not stalking you LOL
Bwahahaha!! I have invaded your subconscious! You're doomed now. ::rubs hands together:: I have sekrit power and influence...how shall I use it...
I decided that I'd keep up the conversation and asked you something about Sam/Jack. Well, that made your day and you went off and somehow I ended up at your house.
This clearly proves your subconscious love of Sam and Jack. You can no longer deny it.
And you showed me this collectible that you'd found bought. It was this ornate shattered champagne glass from Sam and Jack's wedding.
Oooh, how eerie...I like it. There has to be an angsty AU fic in there somewhere...
And I met your husband and son. I promise I am not stalking you LOL
:D See, now, I'm thinking you've never seen a picture of me, so I'm wondering what I looked like.:D
This clearly proves your subconscious love of Sam and Jack. You can no longer deny it.
*snort* I do love Sam and Jack, just not the same way you do ;)
Oooh, how eerie...I like it. There has to be an angsty AU fic in there somewhere...
That's the thing! It wasn't. It was some prop from some AU Avalon (the con) that AT and RDA had on hand for some future episode that in reality isn't going to happen. So, that champagne glass was a happy occasion. They just ended up breaking it like dishes at a Greek wedding.
My brain needs some help. And for the record, while I don't read Sam/Jack in the fandom (which might just be from bad experiences), I am not opposed to it in the fandom. I just don't want overt ship on the show for any pairing, not even ones I keep in the closet. But between you and me (and everyone on LJ apparently) I would take Sam/Jack over Daniel/Vala. I would convert if it meant Daniel and Vala wouldn't hook up ;)
Not that it would ever ever end my delusional ship of Sam/Daniel. Hee.
:D See, now, I'm thinking you've never seen a picture of me, so I'm wondering what I looked like.:D
And you posted a pic to your LJ before so I do know what you look like so nah ;)
*snort* I do love Sam and Jack, just not the same way you do ;)
I know you do, that's why I have fun teasing you, there's no hate.:)
That's the thing! It wasn't. It was some prop from some AU Avalon (the con) that AT and RDA had on hand for some future episode that in reality isn't going to happen. So, that champagne glass was a happy occasion. They just ended up breaking it like dishes at a Greek wedding.
Hunh. Weird.:D I still like the angsty idea, though...
And for the record, while I don't read Sam/Jack in the fandom (which might just be from bad experiences), I am not opposed to it in the fandom. I just don't want overt ship on the show for any pairing, not even ones I keep in the closet.
I'm with ya there. I don't mind onscreen UST or even occasional subtexty 'ship, but I'm dead against overt 'ship. Not on My Stargate. No, no, no.:)
But between you and me (and everyone on LJ apparently)
Ya think?:D I'm just waiting for surrealphantast to thwap us and put us in detention for doing this here....
I would take Sam/Jack over Daniel/Vala. I would convert if it meant Daniel and Vala wouldn't hook up ;)
Oooooh, wicked...;)
Not that it would ever ever end my delusional ship of Sam/Daniel.I love S/D.
And you posted a pic to your LJ before so I do know what you look like so nah ;)
Oh, crap, there was that one photo op pic that made its way to the larger filter, wasn't there...damn.*g*
lol! I find it amusing that, trying to keep the conversation going, Moonshayde asks you about Sam/Jack. Bwah! Because that would SO work!
Also, it's weird the way we (well, I do) dream about people we've never even met before. Not including Jack or Sam or Daniel, who we all *feel* like we've met.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-30 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-30 03:28 pm (UTC)Well, that made your day and you went off and somehow I ended up at your house. And you showed me this collectible that you'd found bought. It was this ornate shattered champagne glass from Sam and Jack's wedding.
And I met your husband and son. I promise I am not stalking you LOL
I have no idea why I dreamed this...
no subject
Date: 2006-11-30 07:04 pm (UTC)I decided that I'd keep up the conversation and asked you something about Sam/Jack. Well, that made your day and you went off and somehow I ended up at your house.
This clearly proves your subconscious love of Sam and Jack. You can no longer deny it.
And you showed me this collectible that you'd found bought. It was this ornate shattered champagne glass from Sam and Jack's wedding.
Oooh, how eerie...I like it. There has to be an angsty AU fic in there somewhere...
And I met your husband and son. I promise I am not stalking you LOL
:D See, now, I'm thinking you've never seen a picture of me, so I'm wondering what I looked like.:D
no subject
Date: 2006-11-30 07:26 pm (UTC)*snort* I do love Sam and Jack, just not the same way you do ;)
Oooh, how eerie...I like it. There has to be an angsty AU fic in there somewhere...
That's the thing! It wasn't. It was some prop from some AU Avalon (the con) that AT and RDA had on hand for some future episode that in reality isn't going to happen. So, that champagne glass was a happy occasion. They just ended up breaking it like dishes at a Greek wedding.
My brain needs some help. And for the record, while I don't read Sam/Jack in the fandom (which might just be from bad experiences), I am not opposed to it in the fandom. I just don't want overt ship on the show for any pairing, not even ones I keep in the closet. But between you and me (and everyone on LJ apparently) I would take Sam/Jack over Daniel/Vala. I would convert if it meant Daniel and Vala wouldn't hook up ;)
Not that it would ever ever end my delusional ship of Sam/Daniel. Hee.
:D See, now, I'm thinking you've never seen a picture of me, so I'm wondering what I looked like.:D
And you posted a pic to your LJ before so I do know what you look like so nah ;)
no subject
Date: 2006-11-30 09:08 pm (UTC)I know you do, that's why I have fun teasing you, there's no hate.:)
That's the thing! It wasn't. It was some prop from some AU Avalon (the con) that AT and RDA had on hand for some future episode that in reality isn't going to happen. So, that champagne glass was a happy occasion. They just ended up breaking it like dishes at a Greek wedding.
Hunh. Weird.:D I still like the angsty idea, though...
And for the record, while I don't read Sam/Jack in the fandom (which might just be from bad experiences), I am not opposed to it in the fandom. I just don't want overt ship on the show for any pairing, not even ones I keep in the closet.
I'm with ya there. I don't mind onscreen UST or even occasional subtexty 'ship, but I'm dead against overt 'ship. Not on My Stargate. No, no, no.:)
But between you and me (and everyone on LJ apparently)
Ya think?:D I'm just waiting for
I would take Sam/Jack over Daniel/Vala. I would convert if it meant Daniel and Vala wouldn't hook up ;)
Oooooh, wicked...;)
Not that it would ever ever end my delusional ship of Sam/Daniel.I love S/D.
And you posted a pic to your LJ before so I do know what you look like so nah ;)
Oh, crap, there was that one photo op pic that made its way to the larger filter, wasn't there...damn.*g*
no subject
Date: 2006-12-01 02:30 am (UTC)Also, it's weird the way we (well, I do) dream about people we've never even met before. Not including Jack or Sam or Daniel, who we all *feel* like we've met.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-30 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-01 02:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-30 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-30 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-30 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-30 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-30 11:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-01 02:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-01 03:26 am (UTC)